Новое о плагиате
Добавлено: Ср сен 26, 2007 4:08 amВот что решили коллеги с форума "Дон Кихот".
Там была двухнедельная дискуссия о плагиате, повторах.
У нас на форуме было ровно такое же предложение-После вынесения решения жюри, выставлять работы-номинанты на интерент и ждать реакции зрителей. И только после этого выносить окончательное решение.
Идея богатая, но нереальная для воплощения.
МЗ
DON QUICHOTTE (DQ)
CARTOON COMMITTEE MEMBERS
DEBATED THE ISSUE ''SIMILARITY''
AND HERE ARE THE CONCLUSION
AND SUGGESTIONS:
By aiming to research, to analyze, to find common platform for different humor mentality of different cultures and eventually to suggest solutions to the cartoon related problems, we gathered over Internet and the first issue which is taken count became ''SIMILAR OR IMITATION.'' Members had long dialogs and shared their ideas and our conclusion we represent here can be seen as our ''suggestion'' to whom it is concerned.
We remind that this Committee have no authority over other institution and people. All artist who are member here are all from around the Globe are professionals who want contribution to the shape of cartoon art as a art.
Here are the conclusion:
1. Whatever you called it, imitation, copying, coincidence, etc, some cartoons, some way of thinking will effect cartoonists and they can be reproduced. Some can be naively looks like copying, but some can show some new mind activity. Not easy to tell. This can be judged on one hand and on the other hand can be seen as if this act is a part of a learning process.
We suggest that these type of cartoons should not be awarded, even if the cartoon fits very much he content of the contest.
Juries who have responsibility on giving a ward should be cultivated and beware of cartoons which are drawn around the world, but also drawn in the large period of history. To obtain juries with professionals is one solution.
2. Some ''similarities'' could have a new idea. New way of thinking. We cannot control the creativity. We suggest that before announcing the award, juries can put the 5-10 candidates to the internet and wait reactions of similarity accusations. Then their award can be announced. This practice will helps for many people will be aware of ''similar cartoons.''
3. Instead of calling the problem as ''plagiarism'' we prefer to call it ''similarity.'' We do not make our fellow cartoonist suspicions of anything and we want respect for this kind of art.
Please add/ or critize sentences if you think the other text will be more suitable. It is we who give shape and meaning o these sentences.
My regards
Firuz
Там была двухнедельная дискуссия о плагиате, повторах.
У нас на форуме было ровно такое же предложение-После вынесения решения жюри, выставлять работы-номинанты на интерент и ждать реакции зрителей. И только после этого выносить окончательное решение.
Идея богатая, но нереальная для воплощения.
МЗ
DON QUICHOTTE (DQ)
CARTOON COMMITTEE MEMBERS
DEBATED THE ISSUE ''SIMILARITY''
AND HERE ARE THE CONCLUSION
AND SUGGESTIONS:
By aiming to research, to analyze, to find common platform for different humor mentality of different cultures and eventually to suggest solutions to the cartoon related problems, we gathered over Internet and the first issue which is taken count became ''SIMILAR OR IMITATION.'' Members had long dialogs and shared their ideas and our conclusion we represent here can be seen as our ''suggestion'' to whom it is concerned.
We remind that this Committee have no authority over other institution and people. All artist who are member here are all from around the Globe are professionals who want contribution to the shape of cartoon art as a art.
Here are the conclusion:
1. Whatever you called it, imitation, copying, coincidence, etc, some cartoons, some way of thinking will effect cartoonists and they can be reproduced. Some can be naively looks like copying, but some can show some new mind activity. Not easy to tell. This can be judged on one hand and on the other hand can be seen as if this act is a part of a learning process.
We suggest that these type of cartoons should not be awarded, even if the cartoon fits very much he content of the contest.
Juries who have responsibility on giving a ward should be cultivated and beware of cartoons which are drawn around the world, but also drawn in the large period of history. To obtain juries with professionals is one solution.
2. Some ''similarities'' could have a new idea. New way of thinking. We cannot control the creativity. We suggest that before announcing the award, juries can put the 5-10 candidates to the internet and wait reactions of similarity accusations. Then their award can be announced. This practice will helps for many people will be aware of ''similar cartoons.''
3. Instead of calling the problem as ''plagiarism'' we prefer to call it ''similarity.'' We do not make our fellow cartoonist suspicions of anything and we want respect for this kind of art.
Please add/ or critize sentences if you think the other text will be more suitable. It is we who give shape and meaning o these sentences.
My regards
Firuz
А я никакого комизма или абсурдности в этих рассуждениях не вижу. Так же, как не вижу и никакого диктата с позиции силы или немедленных требований к кому-то из организаторов. Не нашёл я этого ни в обращении "донкихотовцев", ни в предыдущих постах. Естественно, это было бы глупо. Сергей, мне кажется, что Вы неправильно, чуть ли не болезненно, воспринимаете живой интерес остальных собеседников к проблемам и сложностям конкурсной карикатуры. Никто не говорил о том, что 
